Pricing · twelve published prices
Most consultancies publish a range and call it pricing. This is the actual price list, and it covers both reasons people arrive: building something that does not exist yet, and repairing something that does. Every base package is written out in full, then each addition sits on its own line with the reason it costs what it costs.
If you are building or moving
If you are not sure the work is needed
€500
3 days · read-only · no org access
Four measures against your full data set, a verdict of A, B or C, and a costed order of work. Page two carries the query behind every figure so your admin can reproduce it without me.
Credited in full against any engagement booked within sixty days, so it costs nothing if you proceed.
Where most engagements start
If you know what needs building or moving
€9,000 base, upward from there
8 to 12 weeks at the shape most people describe
Sales Cloud from €13,000, Service Cloud and Nonprofit Cloud from €11,000, Pardot migration from €9,000. At the shape most people describe, those land between €11,900 and €19,600 once the additions are counted, and the estimator shows every line that got you there.
Four estimators price this in your browser before you speak to anyone.
If more than one cloud is in scope
€25,000 and up
Custom timeline
Multi-cloud design across Sales, Service and Marketing with the data model, the guardrails and the handover that lets your team own it by day ninety. Agent design included where it applies.
Scoped individually, because at this size a template would be dishonest.
Everything, as one price list
| Data readiness checkFour measures, a verdict, a costed order of work. Read-only, three days. | €500 |
| Pardot to Marketing Cloud Next migrationTarget architecture, connector, prospect export with history, templates, testing, 60-day handover. Eleven weeks at the smallest scope. | €9,000 |
| Service Cloud implementationCase model, queues, email-to-case, reports, up to 15 agents, training, 60-day handover. Seven weeks at the smallest scope. | €11,000 |
| Nonprofit Cloud implementationConstituent and household model, giving with soft credits and acknowledgement, campaigns, reports, up to 15 staff, training, 60-day handover. Seven weeks at the smallest scope. | €11,000 |
| Sales Cloud implementationWritten data model, objects and stages, sharing, reports, up to 25 seats, training, 60-day handover. Six weeks at the smallest scope. | €13,000 |
| Full architectureMulti-cloud design with the data model, the guardrails and the handover. Custom timeline. | €25,000+ |
| If something is already built and it is broken | |
| Sync audit and repair, with monitoring that reports to a personRecords go missing between systems. Usually a sync error queue nobody watches. 2 weeks. | from €3,000 |
| Scoring rebuild, back-tested against closed-wonSales ignores the leads marketing sends. Usually scoring tuned for a buying process that has since changed. 2 weeks. | from €3,500 |
| Architecture documented, admin trained, handover completed properlyNobody can change anything. Usually the system outlived the person who understood it. 3 weeks. | from €4,000 |
| Layout and process rebuild around what the team actually doesPeople avoid the system. Usually a page layout that asks for more than it gives back. 3 weeks. | from €4,500 |
| Attribution model rebuilt, definitions written down and agreedThe CFO does not believe the numbers. Usually an attribution and data model problem wearing a reporting costume. 3 weeks. | from €5,500 |
| Automation audit, consolidation onto Flow, documented order of executionChanges break things nobody expected. Usually automation written by several people over several years. 4 weeks. | from €6,500 |
Repairs are priced from a diagnosis, so the figure above is a floor rather than a quote. Tick what you are seeing and each one comes back with the cause it usually turns out to be and a check you can run yourself. Prices in euro because the receiving account is in euro, so nothing is converted on arrival. Prepaying half earns seven percent and reserves a start date.
How the number is built
Because a single figure for "a Sales Cloud implementation" is meaningless. Forty seats with no migration and forty seats coming off a broken org are different projects wearing the same name. Hiding that in a range helps nobody except the person quoting.
Each base package lists what is inside it, down to the number of seats or agents covered and the number of weeks it takes. You can compare it against a competing quote line by line, which is the entire point.
Migration above 400,000 records is €9,500 because deduplication decisions stop being bulk operations and start needing workshops. A customer portal is €7,000 because authentication, sharing and branding each involve someone outside the project. The reason travels with the price.
Describe the shape of your project in the browser and every line appears with its amount. No form, no email address, no call. You leave with a document you can take to whoever signs the budget.
Once the written scope is agreed the price cannot move upward. Work discovered afterwards becomes a separate decision with its own price, which you are free to decline. If an estimate turns out wrong, that is my problem rather than a change order.
Against the market
Published 2026 figures, so you can see where these prices sit rather than take my word for it.
| Big 4 senior resourceDeloitte, Accenture and similar | $250–500/hr |
| Senior architect, independent or boutique7+ years, certified | $200–400/hr |
| Certified partner, mid-tierTeam delivery with a project manager | $100–300/hr |
| Mid-market implementation, total projectTypical published range for 11 to 50 users | $25,000–80,000 |
| This practice, Sales Cloud, 40 seats, 150K recordsBase plus seats plus migration, itemised | €19,000 |
That sits at the bottom of the published band, and it is deliberate. There is no delivery manager to fund, no solution architect writing a document that a junior then configures, and no partner margin. What you are paying for is the person doing the work, and the documentation that means you stop needing them.
Where a partner is genuinely the better answer, above roughly 300 seats or where procurement requires a partner tier on the invoice, I will say so rather than take the project.
Not charged for
Questions
Hourly billing pays the consultant for being slow and moves estimation risk to the client, who is the party least able to carry it. A fixed price against a written scope puts that risk where it belongs. If I misjudge how long something takes, the figure does not change.
No, and they are never marked up. You buy them directly at whatever you negotiate. I will tell you which edition your requirements actually need, which on more projects than not is one tier below what was quoted to you.
Paying half up front earns seven percent off the total and reserves a start date. The deposit buys a written scope within five working days, and if that scope and your expectation do not meet, it is returned in full with nothing further owed.
Yes, and it is usually the better order. The €500 readiness check produces a written verdict on whether the work is needed at all, and it is credited in full against any engagement booked within sixty days. Roughly a third of these end with a recommendation that costs nothing.
The price does not change. Elapsed weeks in the estimators are honest expectations rather than commitments, and phases run in sequence because they genuinely depend on each other. A slipped week costs me margin, not you money.
Four estimators, each producing an itemised figure and a phase plan in the browser. No form, no call, no email address required.
Serhii Skrypnyk · RevOps Architect · 7 Salesforce certifications · on the platform since 2018